https://wiki.geekworm.com/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=CommentStreams%3A2ef8ef20a828360e1623719a6b85b77eCommentStreams:2ef8ef20a828360e1623719a6b85b77e - Revision history2026-07-28T04:29:19ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.43.8https://wiki.geekworm.com/index.php?title=CommentStreams:2ef8ef20a828360e1623719a6b85b77e&diff=32387&oldid=prev73.182.230.156: Migrated reply #21972021-12-29T00:55:17Z<p>Migrated reply #2197</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>Hello Lisa,<br />
This is a comment on your answer to "Anonymous user #18"s question. So, the one good drive isn't mirroring back to the drive which replace the failed one within the RAID controller? This is the premise of RAID-1, replacing failed drives without loosing any data. What good is RAID-1 if the failed drive can't be replaced without resetting the RAID?<br />
<br />
Thank You<!-- migrated from Comments; original IP: 73.182.230.156 --></div>73.182.230.156